03-10-2013, 01:28 AM
I'd be pissed if I got a zero on a paper like that. Its a good paper, just because they disagree with the premise doesn't mean it sucks.
The Mature Visual Stimulation Thread
|
03-10-2013, 01:28 AM
I'd be pissed if I got a zero on a paper like that. Its a good paper, just because they disagree with the premise doesn't mean it sucks.
03-10-2013, 07:25 AM
True, but I do understand why he got zero (which in my eyes is a crying shame). Most schools prohibit pronographic material or even just the mention of it, which theoreitcally can lead to either failure of the task/test or even disciplinary hearing depending on the level of exposure.
Even though that is the rules, I still think he deserves some marks, give him the mark that he deserves and just deduct a shit load because of the porn. If that was me, I would've liked to know that my essay was in it's core good. Clearly this guy couldn't give 2 shits if he got zero so why not?? I humour my students most of the time... it lightens things up a bit every now and then.
03-10-2013, 12:04 PM
I have a sneaking suspicion that this paper is not genuine. It is perfectly possible - and somewhat likely - that it was been faked for humorous value.
JoelCarli Wrote:Well curiosity killed the Maps.
03-10-2013, 02:32 PM
True, but I've seen funnier humorous exams.
03-10-2013, 03:40 PM
Naturally - but were they related to the subject which this thread is dedicated to? I saw that picture and thought "Quite. That will fit rather nicely into our little discussion over at beloved MTB"
So, tell me chaps, have any of you had any forays into the realm of risque content of note recently? JoelCarli Wrote:Well curiosity killed the Maps.
03-01-2014, 07:00 PM
This thread needs to be resurrected. My significant other asked me very nicely to request a review of the following:
Any film starring Cytheria (or something like that). Since I myself are unable to view such films at the risk of dying of shame I would like a classy review like the films above if that is at all possible.
03-01-2014, 07:20 PM
I... what.
03-01-2014, 10:48 PM
Why yes, I would be more than happy to oblige the lovely Debbie and her partner:
On a superficial level, Cytherea is fundamentally attractive. A nice body, not the most shapely but far from unattractive. She's a good weight that does not show too many bones but lends her a typical adult film style body. She looks healthy, which is a nice thing to see. For a chest of her size, it is most pleasing to look at. Her breasts are not the largest, but they are a solid example of quality of quantity. Not the best bosom I've seen of late, but her rump makes up for that, with a delectable shape that she can us to its full ability. Her face could be easily lost in a crowd, but the amount of make-up that is put upon her face makes her stand out a little, but still she bears the typical look of the women of her trade. Put her in a room with ten other actresses like her, and you'd be hard pressed to spot her. However, this is all meaningless, as her acting is what we're here to judge. Now onto some of her starring roles: The first video I watched was the run-of-the-mill adult film with a short introduction to the picture, but this was hardly necessary as it was predictable as a rock and lacked any thing bordering plot. However, the cinematography was on par with most professional films, with a mixture of both first-person and third-person, as well as some wider shots. An interesting shot comprised of Cytherea projecting fluid at great speed and distance from her blossoming flower, with much of it landing on and near the camera lens, resulted in a blurring of the lens. This is clearly intentional, to give the viewer some interaction with the picture, the liquid reaching out and drawing them in. It gives them a sense of being a part of something, liberating inhibitions and telling them they can achieve their desires. At the same time, the blurring that results from this release of fluid makes it harder to view the woman performing acts of intense erotic art before us, showing that life is not all about lust, about superficiality. A clever twist in an otherwise lazy film. To use the irony of lashing out against the superficial nature of modern society, in one of the most skin-deep visuals in said society, is quite moving. However, somewhat disappointingly, the intrigue lasts but half a minute and afterwards, all interest is lost. The standard motions continue, with several positional changes - but still the lack of chemistry between the actor and actress remains. Indeed, as they perform the dance of the Missionary towards the end of the final act, Cytherea herself looks alarmingly uncomfortable, with each thrust her face becomes more twisted into disparity. When the firing of the currency contacts her face, she is looking downright depressed. And so, I moved on. The next film I watched did not fair much better than the last. Much like A Doctor's Duty, it was doomed from the start and for much the same reason: The male actor. This man had a rather unattractive and quite off-putting ponytail - his hair drawn back in a scraggly, greasy mess of ugly. This was added to by the treatment of Cytherea's feet at around 4 minutes in. Previously, we had a number of close ups of her feet, primarily her digits and their over-long nails. This built up some foreshadowing of events to come and when they did, they came as no surprise. Upon penetrating Cytherea, the disgusting ponytail-with-a-man-attached took one foot in his mouth, sucking on her toes and making quite unnatural groans. Cytherea, despite her obvious dislike to this act, persevered and kept on uttering the same, recycled lines, desperately grasping onto any minute illusion of pleasure. She failed, I say with a heavy heart. I was quite disillusioned, and this continued as the picture got more and more physical. Cytherea's performance was weaker than the urine expelled from the urethra of a nun, and once they moved onto a rear-focused positioning I was quite bored. The set was dated and dull, with just a bed and some curtains that never quite went out of fashion, as such, but were certainly never actually in fashion in the first place. It appeared to be the spare room of a 50-something divorcee. Not exactly something that screams 'erotic'. I will continue this exploration of the world of Cytherea on the morrow, as at present am I most fatigued and have other business to attend to before I slip into the delicate dance that is sleep. Look forward to some more, my dear fellows. JoelCarli Wrote:Well curiosity killed the Maps.
03-01-2014, 11:16 PM
A yes, thank you Debbie for putting through such a request. I do fully intend to provide my own humble review at a later time, as such becomes possible. Until then, however, I will regretfully abstain from literally processing Nialls analysis (more common people would not have been able to abstain from the vulgar joke-possibility I just recognised in that word) as not to affect my judgment. I'm absolutely positive it is well worth the read, though, and look very much forward to the time I am able to penetrate its rich depths without risk to my own objetivity.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|