The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - Printable Version +- Music Talk Board (https://www.musictalkboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic (https://www.musictalkboard.com/forum-16.html) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.musictalkboard.com/forum-30.html) +--- Thread: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! (/thread-127.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
|
RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - carlcockatoo - 08-10-2014 I'd rather taxpayer money go to MTB than the IDF. #2edgy4u Really though. #Pray4Adam RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - T00DEEPBLUE - 08-10-2014 (08-10-2014, 02:32 PM)carlcockatoo Wrote: I don't know if it's fair to criticise people for signing petitions and 'raising awareness'. Of course 'raising awareness' is often code name for not really doing anything at all and just using issues as a fashion statement. When it comes to people who really are just circlejerking on Tumblr, I think the criticism is valid. But signing petitions and 'raising awareness' (and I mean properly) is better than nothing and I'd encourage everyone to do that. The fact is that most people don't have time to be full time activists and this is what I mean by 'literally everyone can do something'.I agree with that. I know that people don't have the time to be Superman and save all the world's problems, because of course as adults they have responsibilities of their own. But for people who constantly write about it and use the injustices of the world as ammunition to grow popular, I think it's a fair criticism. I don't think that's too different to the Daily Mail, (or most other papers for that matter) where the only reason they broadcast anything is to sell papers. They do it purely in their own self-interest, not in the interest of the people like how it should be. And to me the 'Social Justice' title in that context is merely a ruse that a lot of people never dare to question because doing so makes you an easy target to strawman. (08-10-2014, 12:36 PM)Grungie Wrote: That's not what I was trying to get at. You can still be a privileged white person and still feel miserable, I'm talking about the fact that you're a privileged white male, and you're talking to others about being oppression over race. While I'm not saying you can't care, as you should, the issue is when it's pretty obvious that most of them are pretty out of touch with things, like when they try to act like minorities can't succeed in society, and such.Fair enough, I guess I did take what you said a bit out of context unintentionally. I'm very sensitive to people who make such an argument when out of that context because my parents use such a card to dismiss my feelings and thoughts and I fucking hate it. But that's really my problem and I wouldn't expect anyone to know about it. RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - Grungie - 08-10-2014 #pray4adam Now I can look forward to having a domain name, so it'll look nicer. I could pay to have the ads removed, but most of you have adblock anyway, and it's not like I'm getting money for them either... (08-10-2014, 03:25 PM)T00DEEPBLUE Wrote: Fair enough, I guess I did take what you said a bit out of context unintentionally. I'm very sensitive to people who make such an argument when out of that context because my parents use such a card to dismiss my feelings and thoughts and I fucking hate it. But that's really my problem and I wouldn't expect anyone to know about it. Nah it's cool, I know anyone can be miserable. That's why these images exist when all the SJW's try to act like it's impossible for white people to feel like shit: RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - T00DEEPBLUE - 08-10-2014 (08-10-2014, 02:32 PM)carlcockatoo Wrote: So far all I know that we can do is:This is all good stuff. Even though I cannot afford to be a member of a civil rights movement in South America, there has to be effort and sacrifices made in a small way. I guess that's a good segway to something else somewhat related. Sometimes making even small sacrifices leads to it's own can of worms. One of the most common sacrifices that people make is through the donation of money, to give a charity the resources needed to further their cause. But the vast majority of charities keep almost all the money to themselves. Only a fraction of a percent of what is donated actually goes towards the cause. The cause is merely a weapon against people's sense of morality to encourage them to give them money. Which is why I think to help resolve that problem is to enforce a law that makes it mandatory that a minimum percentage of what is donated goes towards the cause that the charity advertises. Something like 50%. It obviously cannot be 100% because the charity does need some money to maintain itself as a business. I think that if that law was passed, a lot of charities would go bankrupt, but it would probably be unlikely that those 'charities' would've donated anything that meaningful anyway, as the percentage that is donated to the cause is so tiny. I do think that in the long term, the benefits probably would outweigh the loss of these 'charities'. Then again, that would only solve ONE of the problems that charity systems have. It doesn't solve anything regarding the corrupt politicians keeping the donated money to themselves, rather than to invest it in the people. Which is probably an even greater and perhaps completely unsolvable problem. But all of these things need to be addressed somehow because charity movements don't require people to be civil rights activists in South America to make a difference. At least not in theory. RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - JCizzle - 08-10-2014 I agree, Mac, that it's probably for the best if certain "charities" die off once such a law is passed. (08-10-2014, 03:27 PM)Grungie Wrote: #pray4adamI think I already said this, but the only reason I have adblock is because I once got affected with malware that just wouldn't disappear and the only way to hide it was to get adblock :/ I'll take it off for a while and see how things are going. RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - Grungie - 08-10-2014 I installed adblock because some websites have annoying popup ads. Also I'm just lazy and leave it on all the time. RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - crazysam23 - 08-10-2014 I have adblock, although I turn it off on some sites. For instance, MTB & UG...because I like the site. I also am forced to turn it off on Hulu, because videos on Hulu won't play with adblock on. :/ RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - Grungie - 08-11-2014 Like I mentioned, ads don't really help me on MTB, especially when I have to pay to have them removed. Though removing the ads do come with the plus that we can post NSFW shit, but the consensus when I mentioned this, was that none of y'all were interested in that. RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - crazysam23 - 08-11-2014 (08-11-2014, 12:13 AM)Grungie Wrote: Like I mentioned, ads don't really help me on MTB, especially when I have to pay to have them removed.Yeah, but I'm too lazy to turn adblock back on. lol RE: The Venting/Ranting/Hugging Thread! - JCizzle - 08-11-2014 (08-11-2014, 12:13 AM)Grungie Wrote: Like I mentioned, ads don't really help me on MTB, especially when I have to pay to have them removed.True. The only real merit is that the domain name will be your own. |